Volume I: Theories and Models 1. Ludwik Fleck, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (Chicago University Press, 1970), pp. 98–125. 2. C. P. Snow, ‘The Rede Lecture 1959: Part 1, The Two Cultures’, The Two Cultures (Cambridge University Press, 1959), pp. 1–21. 3. Robert K. Merton, ‘The Matthew Effect in Science’, Science, 1968, 159, 3810, 56–63. 4. Leon Trachtman, ‘The Public Understanding of Science Effort: A Critique’, Science Technology and Human Values, 1981, 6, 36, 10–15. 5. Thomas F. Gieryn, ‘Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists’, American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, 781–95. 6. Michel Cloitre and Terry Shinn, ‘Expository Practice: Social, Cognitive and Epistemological Linkages’, in T. Shinn and R. Whitley (eds.), Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. Sociology of the Sciences, IX (D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985), pp. 31–60. 7. Bruno Latour, ‘Literature’, Science in Action: Following Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard University Press, 1987), pp. 21–44. 8. Christopher Dornan, ‘Some Problems in Conceptualising the Issue of "Science and the Media"’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 1990, 7, 1, 48–71. 9. Leah A. Lievrouw, ‘Communication and the Social Representation of Scientific Knowledge’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1990, 7, 1, 1–10. 10. Stephen Hilgartner, ‘The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses’, Social Studies of Science, 1990, 20, 3, 519–39. 11. Brian Wynne, ‘Knowledges in Context’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 1991, 16, 1, 111–21. 12. Mike Michael, ‘Lay Discourses of Science: Science-in-General, Science-in-Particular, and Self’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 1992, 17, 3, 313–33. 13. Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond, ‘About Misunderstandings about Misunderstandings’, Public Understanding of Science, 1992, 1, 1, 17–21. 14. Baudouin Jurdant, ‘Popularization of Science as the Autobiography of Science’, Public Understanding of Science, 1993, 2, 4, 365–73. 15. Massimiano Bucchi, ‘When Scientists Turn to the Public’, Public Understanding of Science, 1996, 5, 4, 375–94. 16. Peter Weingart, ‘Science and the Media’, Research Policy, 1998, 27, 8, 869–79. 17. Steven Miller, ‘Public Understanding of Science at the Crossroads’, Public Understanding of Science, 2001, 10, 1, 115–20. 18. Massimiano Bucchi, ‘Can Genetics help us Rethink Communication? Public Communication of Science as a "Double Helix"’, New Genetics and Society, 2004, 23, 3 269–83. 19. Maja Horst, ‘In Search of Dialogue: Staging Science Communication in Consensus Conferences, in D. Cheng, M. Claessens, N. R. J. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, and S. Shi (eds.), Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices (Springer, 2008), pp. 259–74. 20. Brian Trench, ‘Towards an Analytical Framework of Science Communication Models’, in D. Cheng, M. Claessens, N. R. J. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, and S. Shi (eds.), Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices (Springer, 2008), pp. 119–38. 21. Peter Weingart, ‘The Lure of the Mass Media and its Repercussions on Science’, in P. Weingart, M. Franzen, and S. Rödder (eds), The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and its Repercussions: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 28 (Springer, 2012), pp. 17–32. 22. Alan Irwin, ‘Risk, Science and Public Communication: Third-order Thinking about Scientific Culture’, in M. Bucchi and B. Trench (eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, revised edn. (Routledge, 2014), pp. 160–72. Volume II: Processes and Strategies 23. J. B. S. Haldane, ‘How to Write a Popular Scientific Article’, in K. Dronamraju (ed.), What I Require From Life: Writings on Science and Life from J. B. S. Haldane [1941] (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 154–60. 24. Peter Medawar, ‘Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud?’, in P. Medawar, The Threat and the Glory: Reflections on Science and Scientists (Oxford University Press, 1963), pp. 228–33. 25. Rae Goodell, ‘What’s a Nice Scientist Doing in a Place Like the Press?’, The Visible Scientists (Little, Brown, 1977), pp. 120–41. 26. Royal Society, The Public Understanding of Science, Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 (The Royal Society, 1985), pp. 9–16, 21–8. 27. Rae Goodell, ‘How to Kill a Controversy: The Case of Recombinant DNA’, in S. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers (eds.), Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (The Free Press, 1986), pp. 170–81. 28. Susan L. Star and James R. Griesemer, ‘Institutional Ecology, "Translations" and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–39’, Social Studies of Science, 1989, 19, 387–419. 29. David M. Phillips, E. J. Kanter, B. Bednarczyk, and P. L. Tastad, ‘Importance of the Lay Press in the Transmission of Medical Knowledge to the Scientific Community’, New England Journal of Medicine, 1991, 325, 16, 1180–3. 30. Anders Hansen, ‘Journalistic Practices and Science Reporting in the British Press’, Public Understanding of Science, 1992, 3, 2, 111–34. 31. Bruce V. Lewenstein, ‘From Fax to Facts: Communication in the Cold Fusion Saga’, Social Studies of Science, 1995, 25, 3, 403–36. 32. Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond, ‘The Case for Science Criticism’, La Pierre de Touche: La Science a l’épreuve (Editions Gallimard, 1996), pp. 149–64 (a new translation by David Denby). 33. Hans Peter Peters, ‘The Interaction of Journalists and Scientific Experts: Co-operation and Conflict between Two Professional Cultures’, Media Culture and Society, 1995, 17, 1, 31–48. 34. Carl Sagan, ‘No Such Thing as a Dumb Question’, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark (Headline, 1996), pp. 300–17. 35. Tom Wilkie, ‘Sources in Science: Who Can We Trust?’, Lancet, 1996, 347, 1308–11. 36. Tim Radford, ‘Science for People Who Don’t Want to Know About Science’, Accountability in Research, 1997, 5, 39–43. 37. Jane Gregory and Steven Miller, ‘ABC of Risk: Apples, Beef, and Comets’, Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility (Plenum Press, 1998), pp. 166–95. 38. Sharon Dunwoody, ‘Scientists, Journalists and the Meaning of Uncertainty’, in S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers (eds.), Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999), pp. 59–79. 39. Stephen Jay Gould, ‘Preface’, The Lying Stones of Marrakech: Penultimate Reflections in Natural History (Jonathan Cape 2000), pp. 1-3. 40. Alan Irwin, ‘Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences’, Public Understanding of Science, 2001, 10, 1, 1–18. 41. Susanna Hornig Priest, ‘Re-inventing milk’, A Grain of Truth: The Media, the Public, and Biotechnology (Rowman and Littlefield, 2001), pp. 17–34. 42. Vincent Kiernan, ‘Diffusion of News about Research’, Science Communication, 2003, 25, 1, 3–13. 43. Hans Peter Peters, Dominique Broassard, Suzanne de Cheveigné, Sharon Dunwoody, Monika Kallfass, Steve Miller, and Shoji Tsuchida. ‘Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider’, Science Communication, 2008, 30, 2, 266-276. 44. Stuart Allan, ‘Making Science Newsworthy: Exploring the Conventions of Science Journalism’, in R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, and J. Thomas (eds.), Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 149–65. 45. Brian Trench, ‘Science Reporting in the Electronic Embrace of the Internet’, in R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, and J. Thomas (eds.), Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 166–79. 46. Declan Fahy and Matthew Nisbet, ‘The Science Journalist Online: Shifting Roles and Emerging Practices’, Journalism, 2011, 12, 7, 778–93. 47
