Military Ethics and Peace Psychology A Dialogue:a Special Issue of peace and Conflict

First published in 2005. This is a special issue of the Journal of Peace Psychology which presents a dialogue on military ethics. Including articles on the five obstacles facing military ethics, decision making and collateral, the question of whether wars can be justified, unprofessional soldiers, and lessons learned from the Battle of Algiers.

Volume 11, Number 1, 2005 Contents: J.M. Arrigo, R.V. Wagner, Introduction: A Dialogue Between Peace Psychology and Military Ethics. F. Heider, Violence and Ecology. Lt. Col. D.A. Roblyer, Beyond Precision: Morality, Decision Making, and Collateral Casualties. G. Levinger, Five Obstacles Facing Military Ethics. M. Schwebel, Can Wars Be Just? R.J. Wolfe, J.M. Darley, Protracted Asymmetrical Conflict Erodes Standards for Avoiding Civilian Casualties. M. Deutsch, Commentary on Morality, Decision Making, and Collateral Casualties. Lt. Col. D.A. Roblyer, Response to Four Commentaries on "Beyond Precision." Maj. W. Schrepel, Paras and Centurions: Lessons Learned From the Battle of Algiers. A. Pepitone, Comments on "Paras and Centurions." M. Pilisuk, Unprofessional Warriors: Lesson Small and Large. A.S. Winter, Battle of Algiers/Battle of Baghdad. Maj. W. Schrepel, Responding to Comments on "Paras and Centurions."

Jean Maria Arrigo, Richard V. Wagner