International Law Reports

The International Law Reports is the only publication in the world wholly devoted to the regular and systematic reporting in English of decisions of international courts and arbitrators as well as judgments of national courts. Among the consular relations cases reported are the ICJ decisions on the request for provisional measures in the 1998 Case Concerning the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Paraguay v. United States) the 1999 LaGrand Case (Germany v. United States), and the corresponding decisions of the United States Supreme Court. Human rights cases include the 1999 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Waite and Kennedy v. Germany, concerning whether the defendant's immunity from jurisdiction was considered compatible with right of access to court under Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Also included are fifteen important decisions of the United Nations Human Rights Committee and national courts during the 1990s.

1. Case concerning the Vienna convention on consular relations (Paraguay v. United States of America) (Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures) [International Court of Justice] 9/4/98 (provisional measures) 10/11/98 (discontinuance order); 2. Breard v. Pruett; Breard v. Greene [United States of America] 20/1/98 (Ct Apps) 14/4/98 (Sup Ct); 3. LaGrand Case (Germany v. United States of America) (Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures) [International Court of Justice] 3/3/99; 4. Federal Republic of Germany v. United States and Others [United States of America]] 3/3/99; 5. Suárez Rosero v. Ecuador [Inter-American Court of Human Rights] 12/11/97 (merits) 20/1/99 (reparations); 6. Waite and Kennedy v. Germany (Application No 26083/94) [European Court of Human Rights] 18/2/99; 7. Järvinen v. Finland (Communication No 295/1988) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 25/7/90; 8. Pauger v. Austria (Communication No 415/1990) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 26/3/92; 9. Mojica v. Dominican Republic (Communication No 449/1991) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 15/7/94; 10. Pepels v. Netherlands (Communication No 484/1991) [United Nations Human Rights Committee]; 11. Rodriguez v. Uruguay (Communication No 322/1988) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 19/7/94; 12. Singer v. Canada (Communication No 455/1991) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 26/7/94; 13. Simunek, Tuzilova and Prochazka v. Czech Republic (Communication No 516/1992) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 19/7/95; 14. Andreu v. Colombia (Communication No 563/1993) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 27/10/95; 15. Atkinson, Stroud and Cyr v. Canada (Communication No 573/1994) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 31/10/95; 16. Julian and Drake v. New Zealand (Communication No 601/1994) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 3/4/97; 17. Drobek v. Slovakia (Communication No 643/1995) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 14/7/97; 18. Adu v. Canada (Communication No 654/1995) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 18/7/97; 19. McLawrence v. Jamaica (Communication No 702/1996) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 18/7/97; 20. Hopu and Bessert v. France (Communication No 549/1993) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 29/7/97; 21. Vicente et al v. Colombia (Communication No 612/1995) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 29/7/97; 22. Kubacz v. Shah [Australia] 21/11/83; 23. De Andrade v. de Andrade [Australia]18/6/84; 24. Clunies-Ross v. Commonwealth of Australia and Others [Australia] 25/10/84; 25. Coe (on behalf of the Wiradjuri Tribe) v. Commonwealth of Australia and Another [Australia] 23/12/93; 26. Lindon v. Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [Australia] 6/5/96; 27. Thorpe v. Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) [Australia] 12/6/97; 28. Kruger v. Commonwealth of Australia; Bray v. Commonwealth of Australia [Australia] 31/7/97; 29. CSR Ltd v. CIGNA Insurance Australia Ltd and Others; CSR America Inc v. CIGNA Insurance Australia Ltd and Others [Australia] 5/8/97; 30. Agarwala v. Union of India [India] 31/7/80; 31. Gosalia v. Agarwal and Others [India] 26/8/81; 32. Chern Taong Shang and Another v. Baijal and Others [India] 13/1/88; 33. Charan Lal Sahu and Others v. Union of India [India] 22/12/89; 34. Carvalho v. Hull, Blyth (Angola) Ltd [England] 14/6/79; 35. Midland Bank Plc and Another v. Laker Airways Ltd and Others [England] 30/7/85; 36. Mansouri v. Singh [England] 12/2/86; 37. Kingdom of Spain v. Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd and Another [England] 21/3/86; 38. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Zia Mehmet Binbasi [England] 25/7/89; 39. An International Bank plc v. Republic of Zambia and Others [England] 23/5/97; 40. Attorney-General v. Mobil Oil NZ Ltd [New Zealand] 1/7/87; 41. S v. Ndhlovu [Rhodesia] 7/7/77.

Consular relations cases included in volume 118 are the ICJ decision in the 1998 Case Concerning the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the 1999 LaGrand Case, and the corresponding decisions of the US Supreme Court. Human rights cases include European Court of Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Committee.