International Law Reports

Decisions of international courts and arbitrators, as well as judgements of national courts, are fundamental elements of modern public international law. International Law Reports is the only publication in the world wholly devoted to the regular and systematic reporting in English of such decisions. It is an absolutely essential work of reference. The series, established 60 years ago (originally under the title of Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases), covers the years from 1919. Four volumes a year, each of some 700 pages, is envisaged. The cases are drawn from every relevant jurisdiction - international and national. The series is, therefore, the most convenient source of case law material in the field. The volumes are prepared by an experienced team under the auspices of the Research Centre for International Law in the University of Cambridge. All decisions in foreign languages are translated into English. By reason of its standing and scope of coverage, the series is widely and regularly cited in judgements of international and national tribunals, as well as in the literature of the subject. There is no question here of choosing between this series and some other. There is no other publication that even remotely provides a comparable coverage of case law in this field. The series is a must for every library that needs to provide even minimal international law coverage. It is also the most economical and efficient way of accessing the whole range of international case law material.

Table of Cases Reported; II. Decisions of Municipal Courts: Australian Federation of Islamic Councils Inc. v. Westpac Banking Corporation [Australia] (1988), Young v. Registrar, Court of Appeal and Another [Australia] (1993), Horta and Others v. Commonwealth of Australia [Australia] (1994), Minister of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v. Teoh [Australia] (1995), Re Rudolph and Minister of Employment and Immigration [Canada] (1992), Ciric v. Canada, Minister of Employment and Immigration [Canada] (1993), R v. Vincent [Canada] (1993), Re Attorney-General of Canada and Ward, United Nationas High Commissioner for Refugees et al. [Canada] (1993), R v. Finta [Canada] (1994), Walker et al v. Bank of New York Inc. [Canada] (1994), European Pacific Group Limited and Others v. KPMG Peat Marwick and Others [Cook Islands] (1995), McElhinney v. Williams and Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [Ireland] (1995), Governor of Pitcairn and Associated Islands v. Sutton [New Zealand] (1994), KPMG Peat Marwick and Others v. Davison, Controller and Auditor-General v Davison, Brannigan and Others v. Davison ('Winebox Case') [New Zealand] (1996), Government of the United Kingdom of Saudi Arabia v. Ahmed [England] (1993), T v. Home Secretary [England] (1994), United Arab Emirates v. Abdelghafar and Another, [England] (1994), Arab Republic of Egypt v. Gamal-Eldin [England] (1995), Government of the Knigdom of Saudi arabia v. Ahmed [England] (1995), Paprocki v. German State (Bohn) and Another [England] (1995), Melia v United States [United States of America] (1981), Najohn v. United States [United States of America] (1986), In the Matter of the Extradition of Suarez-Mason [United States of America] (1988), Oen Yin Choy v. Robinson [United States of America] (1988), In the Matter of the Extradition of Atta; Ahmed v. Wigen and Others [United States of America] (1989), In the Matter of the Extradition of Atta; Ahmed v. Wigen and Others [United States of America] (1990), Koskotas v. Roche and Others [United States of America] (1991), In re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos Human Rights Litlgation; Hilao and Others v. Estate of Marcos [United States of America] (1994), Kadic v. Karadzic; Doe I and Doe II v. Karadzic [United States of America] (1994), Kadic v. Karadzic; Doe I and Doe II v. Karadzic [United States of America] (1995), Xuncax and Others v. Gramajo; Ortiz v. Gramajo [United States of America] (1995).