Volume I: The Philosophy of Intellectual History 1. John Patrick Diggins, ‘Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Challenge of Intellectual History’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2006, 67, 1, 181–208. 2. Quentin Skinner, ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’, History and Theory, 1969, 8, 1, 3–53. 3. Quentin Skinner, ‘The Rise of, Challenge to, and Prospects of, a Collingwoodian Approach to the History of Political Thought’, in D. Castiglione and I. Hampsher-Monk (eds.), The History of Political Thought in National Context (Cambridge, 2011). 4. John Dunn, ‘The Identity of the History of Ideas’, Philosophy, 1968, 43, 164, 85–104. 5. John Pocock, ‘Present at the Creation: With Laslett to the Lost Worlds’, International Journal of Public Affairs, 2006, 2, 7–17. 6. Reinhart Koselleck, ‘Linguistic Change and the History of Events’, Journal of Modern History, 1989, 61, 4, 649–66. 7. Melvin Richter, ‘Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe’, History and Theory, 1990, 29, 1, 38–70. 8. Dominick Lacapra, ‘Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts’, History and Theory, 1980, 19, 3, 245–76. 9. Joseph M. Levine, ‘Intellectual History as History’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005, 66, 2, 189–200. 10. Mark Bevir, ‘The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism’, History & Theory, 1992, 31, 276–98. 11. Iain Hampsher-Monk, ‘Political Languages in Time: The Work of J. G. A. Pocock’, British Journal of Political Science, 1984, 14, 89–116. 12. Robert Lamb, ‘Quentin Skinner’s Revised Historical Contextualism: A Critique’, History of the Human Sciences, 2009, 22, 3, 51–73. 13. Anthony Grafton, ‘The History of Ideas: Precept and Practice, 1950–2000 and Beyond’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2006, 67, 1, 1–32. Volume II: Classic essays—philosophers 14. A. Laks, ‘Legislation and Demiurgy: On the Relation Between Plato’s Republic and Laws’, Classical Antiquity, 1990, 9, 209–29. 15. T. H. Irwin, ‘Moral Science and Political Theory in Aristotle’, History of Political Thought, 1985, 6, 150–68. 16. W. Ambler, ‘Aristotle on Nature and Politics: The Case of Slavery’, Political Theory, 1987, 15, 390–411. 17. E. M. Atkins, ‘Domina et Regina Virtutum: Justice and Societas in De Officiis’, Phronesis, 1990, 35, 258–89. 18. R. Martin, ‘The Two Cities in Augustine’s Political Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1972, 33, 195–216. 19. L. Petterman, ‘Dante’s Monarchy and Aristotle’s Political Thought’, Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History, 1973, 10, 1–40. 20. C. J. Nederman and C. Campbell, ‘Priests, Kings and Tyrants: Spiritual and Temporal Power in John of Salisbury’s Policraticus’, Speculum, 1991, 66, 572–90. 21. M. Ryan, ‘Bartolus of Sassoferrato and Free Cities’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 2000, 10, 65–89. 22. Q. Skinner, ‘Machiavelli on the Maintenance of Liberty’, Politics, 1983, 18, 3–15. 23. B. Bradshaw, ‘More on Utopia’, Historical Journal, 1981, 24, 1–27. 24. J. H. M. Salmon, ‘The Legacy of Jean Bodin: Absolutism, Populism or Constitutionalism?’, History of Political Thought, 1996, 17, 500–22. 25. A. Cromartie, ‘Theology and Politics in Richard Hooker’s Thought’, History of Political Thought, 2000, 21, 41–66. 26. B. Worden, ‘Milton’s Republicanism and the Tyranny of Heaven’, in G. Bock, Q. Skinner, and M. Viroli (eds.), Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge, 1990). 27. Knud Haakonssen, ‘Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought’, Political Theory, 1985, 13, 2, 239–65. 28. Noel Malcolm, ‘Hobbes’s Theory of International Relations’, Aspects of Hobbes (Oxford, 2002), pp. 432–56. 29. Quentin Skinner, ‘Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 1999, 7, 1–29. 30. John Dunn, ‘Consent in the Political Theory of John Locke’, Historical Journal, 1967, 10, 2, 153–82. 31. D. Armitage, ‘John Locke, Carolina and the Two Treatises of Government’, Political Theory, 2004, 32, 602–27. 32. Paul Schuurman, ‘Fénelon on Luxury, War and Trade in the Telemachus’, History of European Ideas, 2012, 38, 2. 33. Istvan Hont, ‘Free Trade and the Economic Limits to National Politics: Neo-Machiavellian Political Economy Reconsidered’, in John Dunn (ed.), The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (Cambridge, 1990). 34. E. J. Hundert, ‘Bernard Mandeville and the Enlightenment’s Maxims of Modernity’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1995, 56, 4, 577–93. 35. James Moore, ‘Hume’s Theory of Justice and Property’, Political Studies, 1976, 24, 103–19. 36. Judith N. Shklar, ‘Rousseau’s Two Models: Sparta and the Age of Gold’, Political Science Quarterly, 1966, 81, 1, 25–51. 37. Donald Winch, ‘Adam Smith: Scottish Moral Philosopher as Political Economist’, Historical Journal, 1992, 35, 1, 91–113. 38. G. J. Barker-Benfield, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthswoman’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1989, 50, 95–115. 39. J. G. A. Pocock, ‘Burke and the Ancient Constitution: A "Problem in the History of Ideas"’, Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History (London, 1972), pp. 202–32. 40. J. H. Burns, ‘Bentham and the French Revolution’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 1966, 16, 95–114. 41. Filimon Peonidis, ‘Jeremy Bentham’s "Unusually Liberal" Representative Democracy’, History of European Ideas, 2011, 37, 4. 42. Donald Winch, ‘Robert Malthus: Christian Moral Scientist, Arch-Demoralizer, or Implicit Secular Utilitarian?’, Utilitas, 1993, 5, 239–50. 43. S. B. Smith, ‘What is "Right" In Hegel’s Philosophy of Right?’, American Political Science Review, 1989, 83, 1, 3–18. 44. K. Steven Vincent, ‘Benjamin Constant, the French Revolution, and the Origins of French Romantic Liberalism’, French Historical Studies, 2000, 23, 4, 607–37. 45. J. H. Burns, ‘The Light of Reason: Philosophical History in the Two Mills’, in J. M. Robson and M. Laine (eds.), James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference (Toronto, 1976), pp. 3–20. 46. D. Doveton, ‘Marx and Engels on Democracy’, History of Political Thought, 1994, 15, 4. 47. P. Allen, ‘S. T. Coleridge’s Church and State and the Idea of an Intellectual Establishment’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1985, 46, 89–106. 48. M. Richter, ‘Tocqueville and Guizot on Democracy: From a Type of Society to a Political Regime’, History of European Ideas, 2004, 30, 61–82. 49. Judith N. Shklar, ‘Emerson and the Inhibitions of Democracy’, Political Theory, 1990, 18, 4, 601–14. 50. Peter Ghosh, ‘Max Weber’s Idea of "Puritanism": A Case Study in the Empirical Construction of the Protestant Ethic’, History of European Ideas, 2003, 29, 2, 183–221. 51. W. Hennis, ‘The Spiritualist Foundation of Max Weber’s "Interpretative Sociology": Ernst Troeltsch, Max Weber and William James’ Varieties of Religious Experience’, History of the Human Sciences, 1998, 11, 2, 83–106. 52. Lewis S. Feuer, ‘John Dewey and the Back to the People Movement in American Thought’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1959, 20, 4, 545–68. 53. W. Scheuermann, ‘The Rule of Law Under Siege: Carl Schmitt and the Death of the Weimar Republic’, History of Political Thought, 1993, 14, 265–80. 54. Peter Ghosh, ‘Citizen Or Subject? Michel Foucault in the History of Ideas’, History of European Ideas, 1998, 24, 2. Volume III: Classic essays by intellectual historians 55. B. Tierney, ‘"The Prince is Not Bound by the Laws": Accursius and the Origins of the Modern State’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1963, 5, 378–400. 56. F. Oakley, ‘Natural Law, the Corpus Mysticum, and Consent in Conciliar Thought from John of Paris to Matthias Ugonius’, Speculum, 1981, 56, 786–810. 57. Quentin Skinner, ‘Ambrogio Lorenzetti's Buon Governo Frescoes: Two Old Questions, Two New Answers’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 1999, 62, 1–28. 58. Horst Drietzel, ‘Reason of State and the Crisis of Political Aristotelianism: An Essay on the Development of 17th-Century Political Philosophy’, History of European I
