Engineering Geophysics

Engineering Geophysics connects onshore geotechnical engineering challenges to the geophysical methodsthat may be applied to solve them. Unknown geological conditions are a risk in construction projects, and geophysical information can help to identify those risks. The book answers questions on how, why, and when the individual and combined methods provide the results requested. Flowcharts guide the reader to geophysical methods that can be applied for various engineering challenges, and the solutions are illustrated with practical case histories. The book is intended mainly for geotechnical engineers and geologists but also for geophysicists or managers in need of an overview or brushup on geophysical methods and their practical applications. In addition, it can be used by educational institutions in courses both for geotechnical engineers and geologists.

1. Introduction.Lone Klinkby & Anna Bondo Medhus 2. Scope of Work.Anna Bondo Medhus & Lone Klinkby 3. Relationship between geotechnical and geophysical methods.Michael Long 4. Gravimetric Methods.Olivier Francis 5. Magnetometer Methods.Joanna Hamlyn 6. Direct current resistivity methods.Douglas W. Oldenburg, Seogi Kang, Lindsey J. Heagy & Michael Maxwell 7. Electromagnetic methods. Niels Bøie Christensen 8. Ground Penetrating Radar.Matteo Rossi 9. Reflection Seismic Methods.Richard D. Miller 10. Seismic Refraction Methods.Colin A. Zelt 11. Surface Waves Methods.Julian Ivanov 12. Case: Mapping potential Unexploded Ordnance (UXO).Joanna Hamlyn 13. Case:Geophysical investigation to delineate landfill.Joanna Hamlyn 14. Case: 3D GPR in the inner yard at Frederiksborg Castle.Ole Frits Nielsen & Søren Wedel Nielsen 15. Case: Mapping of utilities when developing at an old coal storage facility.Peter Thomsen 16. Case: Near surface electromagnetic survey to support the design of urban development plans.Peter Thomsen 17. Case: Archaeological Investigation to identify a Romano-British farmstead using magnetic gradiometry.Joanna Hamlyn 18. Case: Integrated Geophysical survey to locate buried structures.Joanna Hamlyn 19. Case:Total field magnetometryto locateburied foundations.Joanna Hamlyn 20. Case: Utility mapping with GPR at Copenhagen Harbour.Ole Frits Nielsen & Søren Wedel Nielsen 21. Case: Thickness of peat and depth to bedrock for road construction using Ground Penetrating Radar.Jaana Gustafsson 22. Case: Multidisciplinary geophysical investigation for a new railway track in Norway.Roger Wisén, Anders Almholt & Fredrik Olsen 23. Case: Road maintenance and ground frost.Jaana Gustafsson 24. Case: Depth to bedrock detection by integration of Airborne EM data with sparse geotechnical drilling data for early phase road alignment.Craig W. Christensen, Guro H. Skurdal, Andi A. Pfaffhuber & Martin Panzner 25. Case: Delineation of Aggregates Gravels, Sands, and Silts using Electrical Resistivity Tomography.Chris Phillips 26. Case: Delineation of Material Type for Use in Ready-mix Concrete.Barry Balding 27. Case: Mapping Railroad Ballast and Geology using Ground Penetrating Radar.Jaana Gustafsson 28. Case: Assessing Loose Soils for Tower Cable Anchors using Electrical Resistivity.Fern Webb 29. Case: Delineation of Soft Soils and Bedrock Depth using integrated methods.Michael Maxwell 30. Case: High-definition bedrock depth and conditions for urban construction project site evaluation in Switzerland using seismic refraction with combined GRM and tomographic approach.Pier Vittorio Radogna, Christophe Vergniault & David Dupuy 31. Case: Paleo-channel investigation for seepage pathway potentials.Daniel E. Kramer 32. Case: Near-surface electromagnetic survey to support the design of climate adaptation in urban development plans.Peter Thomsen 33. Case: Geophysical investigation of slope stability using Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Seismic Refraction, and Surface Waves.Joanna Hamlyn 34. Case: Integrated geophysical investigation to map a landslip.Joanna Hamlyn 35. Case: Mapping of quick clay risk by Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT).Torleif Dahlin 36. Case: Quick clay volume delineation based on AEM resistivity, geotechnical soundings, and lab samples.Craig W. Christensen, Andi A. Pfaffhuber, Guro H. Skurdal & Martin Panzner 37. Case: Depth to bedrock and weak zone detection for tunnel design under water passages.Torleif Dahlin, Mathias Ronczka & Roger Wisén 38. Case: 3D model of depth to bedrock for a new train tunnel under the capital of Norway.Fredrik Olsen, Anders Almholt & Roger Wisén 39. Case: Screening for ground risk ahead of tunnel design and construction activities.James Russell & Edward Cox 40. Case: Geometrical complex ground model for large industrial construction sites: Ultra-High-Resolution with shear waves –Qualification flow and application.Pier Vittorio Radogna & Christophe Vergniault 41. Case: Identifying weakness zones and geological boundaries across tunnel alignments using airborne electromagnetics.Anne H. Rasmussen, Giselle M. Linares, Craig W. Christensen & Martin Panzner 42. Case: Delineation of Soil Type, Dam Leakage, Underground Voids, and Water Flow in Tunnels.Michael Maxwell, Robert Eso & Brodie Klue 43. Case: Pre-investigations for horizontal directional drilling in Copenhagen.Ole Frits Nielsen, Søren Wedel Nielsen & Søren Stricker Mathiasen 44. Case: Mapping depth to bedrock along a planned cable route.Bo Bergman, Daniel Juul Okholm & Anders Edsen 45. Case: Mapping bedrock profiles for cable landings using seismic refraction and surface waves (MASW).Joanna Hamlyn 46. Case: Lake bottom investigations with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR).Jaana Gustafsson 47. Case: Pre-investigations for pipeline crossing of a stream.Ole Frits Nielsen, Søren Wedel Nielsen & Søren Stricker Mathiasen 48. Case: Delineation of Palaeokarst Features Under a Proposed Tailings Facility Using ERT, Seismic Refraction, and Micro-Gravity.Barry Balding 49. Case: The Identification of Leaks in Tailings Storage Facility Impoundment Dam Walls using ERT and IP.Barry Balding 50. Case: Groundwater vulnerability assessment for new motorway using ERT.Torleif Dahlin, Elisabet Hammarlund & Roger Wisén

Anna Bondo Medhus holds a Ph.D. in seismology from the Department of GeoScience, Aarhus University, 2010. In her current position at Energinet, Anna works with pre-investigations related to energy transmission projects and renewable energy. Anna was a researcher and research program manager at VIA University College (2018-2022) in the Center of Applied Research and Development in Building, Energy and Environment (Horsens, Denmark). She managed research projects mainly related to pre-investigation for urban development projects and in collaboration with several partners like consultancy companies, and utilities. She developed and taught a course in geophysics for engineering students, which provided insight on the needs of engineers and how to teach students from other professions. From 2010 to 2018 Anna was employed in COWI as a specialist in applied geophysics working with site investigations for various construction and foundation projects in nationwide and international project groups. She was leading work on optimizing data access and data management throughout COWIs geoscience, groundwater, and geotechnical groups. Anna has always had a focus on the dissemination of knowledge with a keen eye for the interest, needs and starting point of the audience. Her art is to make difficult topics easily understandable without compromising on facts. Lone Klinkby holds a PhD in deep reflection seismics from the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Aarhus, 1998. Currently Lone works in COWI as Project Director and Business Development Director within Energy and Geoscience. From 2008-2011 she worked within Research and Development at Vattenfall with a focus on deep CO2storage demonstrations projects in Denmark and Germany. Further, she participated in international scientist projects and networks on CO2storage guidance and monitoring. Former positions include research on reservoir geophysical data at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (1998-2005). COWI is an international consulting group within the engineering disciplines of energy, buildings, infrastructure, and environment. Lone is part of a group of geophysicists and geologists working across departments in close connection with COWIs geotechnical groups. Since 2011 she has worked with applied geophysics for projects related to deep and shallow foundations both on- and offshore. She is an active participant in international project groups and her work includes leading combined projects on pre-investigations and for establishing decision foundations for the transition toward renewable energy. Lone work in the interface between professions and strive for increasing interpersonal understanding for the benefit of the projects.