
Questo prodotto usufruisce delle SPEDIZIONI GRATIS
selezionando l'opzione Corriere Veloce in fase di ordine.
Pagabile anche con Carta della cultura giovani e del merito, Carta della Cultura e Carta del Docente
This open access book provides a novel insight into the field exploring the potential for the sensing citizens to concretely influence risk governance by filling (intentional or accidental) official informational gaps. Grassroots-driven environmental monitoring based on own senses or on sensor technology, i.e., citizen sensing, can be considered a constructive response to crises. When lay people distrust official information or just want to fill data gaps, they may resort to sensors and data infrastructures to visualize, monitor, and report risks caused by environmental factors to public health. Although through a possible initial conflict, citizen sensing may ultimately have the potential to contribute to institutional risk governance. Citizen sensing proves to be a practice able to address governance challenges in the way data over an (environmental) risk problem are gathered and provided to the public. This essentially unveils the issue of a perceived legitimacy gap in current (environmental) risk governance. Nonetheless, it also opens avenues for a more inclusive and transparent governmental response to pressing and complex risks, affecting first and foremost local people.
Chapter 1 – Introduction.- Chapter 2 - The concepts of public and environmental health risk governance: hidden controversies in apparently plain notions.- Chapter 3 - Identifying dominant models of environmental health risk governance.-Chapter 4 - Hypothesizing a new approach to risk governance based on citizen sensing.-Chapter 5 - Conclusion.
Anna Berti Suman provides a critical review of notions that are often contested nowadays, such as public and environmental health, risk and risk governance. She carefully engages with such concepts to identify gaps in existing literature and to develop a theory on how forms of spontaneous environmental monitoring from civil society could strengthen institutional risk governance. In doing so, she sheds light on an approach that can be very relevant to address and mediate conflicts stemming from the management of complex risk problems.


Il sito utilizza cookie ed altri strumenti di tracciamento che raccolgono informazioni dal dispositivo dell’utente. Oltre ai cookie tecnici ed analitici aggregati, strettamente necessari per il funzionamento di questo sito web, previo consenso dell’utente possono essere installati cookie di profilazione e marketing e cookie dei social media. Cliccando su “Accetto tutti i cookie” saranno attivate tutte le categorie di cookie. Per accettare solo deterninate categorie di cookie, cliccare invece su “Impostazioni cookie”. Chiudendo il banner o continuando a navigare saranno installati solo cookie tecnici. Per maggiori dettagli, consultare la Cookie Policy.